Editing Openai/691b7dfb-8d4c-8006-b835-54f81173b3df (section)

=== Assistant: Here’s how I’d look at this situation — calmly, realistically, and strategically: ===
Here’s how I’d look at this situation — calmly, realistically, and strategically:

===== A lot of people panic when they see an RFE, but in most TN cases (especially CSA / Engineer / PM roles), RFEs are very fixable as long as the response is strong and detailed. =====
The main issue here is poorly written job duties, which is extremely common when HR or lawyers submit generic language.

USCIS is basically saying:

: 

That’s fixable.
A well-written RFE response usually solves this.

===== 1. The job duties were too vague =====
# The RFE support was submitted without review
# USCIS wants proof the job fits the Engineer classification
# They want: - A detailed duty breakdown - A manager reference letter - Org chart - Evidence of technical work (not just “managing tasks”)

===== I strongly agree with the lawyer on this part. =====

If you try to do this while USCIS is reviewing your case, a CBP officer may say:

: 

And the risk is:
* They cancel your current TN
* They refuse you entry
* They add notes to your file

Not guaranteed — but a very real risk.

===== Best path: =====
* Submit a strong response to the RFE
* Wait for approval
* Then move forward cleanly

The RFE already tells you what USCIS wants.
Give it to them in detail — problem solved.

===== It depends: =====

Worst case: USCIS denies the petition
→ You still have your current TN, valid until expiration
→ You can keep working for the old employer
→ You can apply again with:
* Better duties
* Better lawyer
* Better packet

A denial is a setback, not the end.

===== Not really — IF they respond properly. =====

This type of RFE is:
* Very normal
* Very common
* Very often approved

The danger only comes if:
* The job description really is non-technical, or
* The lawyer responds weakly

===== 1. Stop thinking about the border option =====
It’s too risky. USCIS already has the file.
# Fix the job duties properly
They should:
* Be technical
* Mention tools, systems, and methods
* Show engineering analysis, not just scheduling

Something like:

: 

—not:

: 
# Get the manager reference letter right
Must clearly say:

: 
# Respond fast, but with quality
Do not rush a low-effort reply.
But do not wait 70 days either.

===== - Do not try to enter while an RFE is open =====
* Fix the duties & documentation
* Let the lawyer respond properly
* This RFE is survivable
* A denial is not the end
* A clean approval now keeps everything simple

If you are in a similar situation with your TN petition:
You have a BIG advantage:

You already know what USCIS wants, and you’re building that into your support letter ''before filing''.