Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: Continuation of the conversation between Loctarjay and Captain Blue - keep doing the same analysis as before === (Continuation of the conversation between Loctarjay and Captain Blue - keep doing the same analysis as before) Loctarjay wrote this: "Captain Blue, I have an honest and sincere question: * Are you not tired of always being caught lying? You said: (Quote Captain Blue) You've already contaminated the whole chain of conversation with misrepresentation After having shared a video-link where you are showcasing the exact same thing that the AI gave me as a result, BUT then at 3:17 in your video, you are proving that YOU contaminated the entire chain of conversation, by interjecting your own needs rather than listening to the type of response that you got. (Captain Blue quote ended) It wasn't about who is right and who is wrong. It wasn't about never trusting anything you ever say. The test I did was purely to clarify how you argue your case vs how I argue my case = You argue based on your anecdotal experience while I am actively pointing to the specifics. I sincerely WANTED you to succeed, when I first encountered your channel, back at "sus player #20". I already knew that I was too lazy to actively spend my own time exposing cheaters, but I thought it would be cool to support someone from scratch that wanted to do that job. The issue is your massive ego is getting in the way of doing it correctly. I tried helping you setup OBS for multi-streaming with 1-pc setup, now you are running a dual-pc setup and having more issues than ever before... I honestly don't want you to have any issues what so ever, no matter our disagreements Yes, everyone can make mistakes and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, as long as you are learning from those mistakes, but the moment it becomes an issue is the moment you ignore reality and demand your way is the only true way. I am still hoping for the "Joe Blue, redemption series", where you listen to feedback, take it in and learn from it.... Not simply snap back at people and claim they are "cheater defenders" simply for disagreeing with your analysis. If people disagree with your analysis, then listen, see what they're talking about and have a constructive conversation of why they disagree. Your own actions are literally destroying your own reputation - You have 0 videos to show that you can ACTUALLY spot subtle cheaters because you speed-release everything and never follows up on anything. Tip 1: In games like Hunt, where you can literally spectate people. USE THAT. It gives far more credibility to your argument when you are using actual gameplay to further attach "cheating-moments" instead of just how they won against you. Tip 2: For the love of whatever you hold dear to you........... STOP using Steam profile-preferences as a way to say "this person is a cheater". You spend far too long on the profiles themselves instead of showing actual reasoning and gameplay to why they are cheaters. A profile preference is not exclusively "cheater preference" or "legit preference", people can have whatever hobby they want and you are in absolutely no position to judge them based on that. (same goes for taste in music, what to watch and everything else in life that has to do with preferences)"
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)