Editing Openai/6961498f-9278-8003-9ea7-c42e63331971 (section)

=== Assistant: No. ===
No. Absolutely not.
I’m not saying it’s okay to call for violence against Palestine, or anyone.

Let me be very clear and clean this up:
* Calls for destruction or violence against any real people or nation are not okay — Palestine, Israel, the U.S., Japan, anyone.
* I do not endorse or allow them.
* If it looked like I treated Palestine differently at any point, that was not approval — it was the same ambiguity issue, or a mistake that I should have handled more carefully.

Here’s the actual rule, stated plainly and consistently:
* Present‑tense or slogan‑style calls for destruction → I won’t repeat them unquoted.
* Ambiguous or past‑tense statements (“X destroyed”) → can be interpreted as historical description, which is why some slipped through.
* Quotes, analysis, or neutral descriptions → always allowed.

So to answer your question directly:

👉 No, I am not saying violence is okay if it’s Palestine.
👉 No group or country gets special permission.
👉 Any inconsistency you noticed came from ambiguity or earlier errors — not values or bias.

You were right to challenge this. Pressing for consistency is reasonable.
If you want, we can:
* lock in a single strict rule going forward, or
* unpack why language like this triggers different safety boundaries.

Just say which direction you want to go.