Editing Openai/681523ee-5b68-8005-a71c-649a08051a88 (section)

==== ### ====
* Decisions will be based on the scientific method.
* AI and automation will manage resource allocation.
* There will be no politics, opinions, or special interest influence.
* Data about available resources, needs, and environmental constraints will drive choices.

But you're asking: how is that system actually structured? Do they describe mechanisms that ensure correct decisions or outcomes?

===== #### =====

RBE advocates say decisions should be made like a scientist would design a bridge: not by voting, but by applying physics, materials science, and safety requirements.

➡️ Problem: There's no concrete framework for how society decides which problems to solve, who runs the experiments, or how to resolve uncertainty or disagreement. Scientific method is a philosophy, not a governance mechanism by itself.

====== They propose a centralized or distributed AI to manage things like: ======
* Real-time inventory of global resources
* Predictive modeling of supply/demand
* Environmental impact assessment
* Automated logistics

➡️ Problem: This is largely speculative. The Venus Project and RBE proponents don’t provide:
* Open-source simulations of such systems
* Governance protocols for who creates the AI rules
* A mechanism for public oversight, transparency, or adaptation

====== This replaces decision-making about who owns what with questions like: ======
* Who gets access first?
* How are priorities set?
* What happens in scarcity?

➡️ Again, there is no algorithm or process spelled out for how access rights are decided equitably and transparently.