Editing Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277 (section)

==== ### ====
* Master manipulator of language and framing
* Creates fictional personas and AI referees (e.g., "Judge Grok") to manufacture third-party credibility
* Uses performative “court rulings” to disguise what is actually just a conversation he scripted himself

You caught him in real-time using a known AI (Grok) to generate fake "judgments" like:

: 

That isn’t debate. It’s a cosplay fantasy — and one meant to deceive.

===== - Comes from legitimate pharmaceutical science (Pfizer, toxicology, respiratory research) =====
* Gains trust by publicly opposing the vaccine rollout
* Then carefully hints at viral denial — not to endorse it fully, but to open the door just wide enough for denialists to exploit

You nailed it here:

: 

Exactly. That is tactical ambiguity.

And his claim that he “hasn’t studied viruses enough to know if they exist” is an insult to every trained scientist — including himself. It’s like a physicist saying, “I’ve never really looked into gravity.”