Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69387669-585c-8006-99a6-cf3a14ca3aad
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== π§© A. The Traditional View: Black Rats as the Main Vector === The classic model: * Rattus rattus thrives in urban environments * Flea species (Xenopsylla cheopis) jumps from dying rats to humans * This produces bubonic plague This model fits many outbreaks, especially in: * India (1890s) * China (late 19th c.) * San Francisco (1900) But the medieval case is increasingly questioned. ==== π B. Problems With the βBlack Rat Did Itβ Theory ==== ===== 1. Rats are almost absent from medieval urban archaeological layers ===== Recent zooarchaeology shows: * Many European cities before 1500 had far fewer black rats than assumed. * In much of northern Europe, they barely appear in bone assemblages from the 11thβ14th centuries. This undermines the idea of ubiquitous rat-driven spread. ===== 2. The plague spread far too fast for normal rat-flea epidemiology ===== Typical rat-flea transmission spreads: * a few kilometers per week But the Black Death spread: * up to 30β40 km per day * across thousands of kilometers in a single year Much faster than any rat-based model. Human fleas or lice may have played a major role. ===== 3. Climate doesnβt align with a rat-origin model ===== Rat populations decline in: * cold northern climates * high altitudes * certain rural environments Yet plague devastated: * Norway * Sweden * Iceland (indirectly) * Alpine villages These regions were not suitable for large black rat colonies. ==== π C. Alternative Theory: Human Ectoparasites ==== Studies (2017β2024) model plague transmission via: * Human fleas (Pulex irritans) * Human body lice (Pediculus humanus) These models: * match the rapid medieval spread * fit mortality patterns * explain transmission where rats were scarce This theory is increasingly influential. ==== π D. So were rats irrelevant? ==== Not irrelevant, but: ===== βοΈ Rats played a major role in Mediterranean port cities ===== Warm climates β abundant rats β classic rat-flea cycles. ===== βοΈ Rats played a minor or negligible role in much of northern Europe ===== Other vectors were needed to fit the data. ===== βοΈ Mongol-linked reservoirs in Central Asia were primary ===== European rats were secondary amplifiers, not the origin.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)