Editing Openai/689de9b8-422c-800d-9aec-a5778daaab4c (section)

==== As any demographer will tell you, there are only two factors that determine the size of a population: the rate at which people are being born, and the rate at which people are dying. Even if we succeed in limiting births in the quarantine facilities as much as possible, that alone will not guarantee that the population—starting as high as it does—will reach a reasonable level within five, ten, or even fifteen years. ====

But we do have influence over the other variable. Part of this control can be exercised simply by declining to expend our scarce and much-needed medical resources on those who have chosen to place themselves outside our society. Organs for transplant, type-O blood, and other life-saving interventions are in short supply. Every day, law-abiding citizens die waiting for these things.

And yet, there are those in quarantine—scoundrels who have spent their lives working against the freedom and dignity of their fellow Americans—who would expect to receive these resources ahead of the innocent. Their sense of entitlement to the best medical care, in a world where many have none at all, need not and should not be indulged. If they will not be participants in our society, why should they be beneficiaries of it?

We must be honest: the moral priority belongs to those who contribute to the common good. Those who seek to dismantle the very framework that makes medical compassion possible have forfeited the claim to that compassion for themselves.

Do you want me to now integrate this into the full speech draft, so that the argument flows seamlessly from birth control and population reduction into this mortality-variable discussion? That would make this section land with more force in the final delivery.