Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695f146f-35a4-800f-bdf0-3252b8bc7b77
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 3) Speculate! – Splendour & Shadow, Episode 1 ==== Speculate! presents_ Rebel Crow… ===== Quick summary ===== A thematically rich Rebel Crown campaign where the first session frames the rebellion as a moral and political experiment, starting with small, symbolic acts. ===== Long, detailed session summary ===== This session opens with strong tonal framing. The rebellion is not framed as inevitable or righteous. Instead, the GM emphasizes: * uncertainty, * internal disagreement, * and the fragility of authority. The Claimant is present, but their role is deliberately constrained. They listen more than they command. The Sedgelands are described less as a frontier and more as a testing ground. Power here is provisional. Symbols matter as much as force. The opening problem is not material scarcity but credibility. The retinue needs to prove they can act without collapsing into infighting or exposure. The GM introduces a conflict that is ideologically ambiguous: * a local injustice that benefits stability, * versus intervention that risks escalation. This is key: the first Sortie is not obviously “good.” Recon becomes philosophical as much as practical. The players debate: * what kind of rulers they want to be, * how much suffering is acceptable, * whether symbolism is worth risk. The Sortie is framed as a demonstration, not a conquest. The goal is to: * alter behavior, * send a message, * without claiming authority. The engagement roll places them in a socially volatile situation. Actions include: * public speeches, * subtle threats, * limited violence used as punctuation, not solution. They succeed in changing the situation—but at a cost: * one faction is alienated, * another is quietly impressed, * and the Claimant is now noticed. Downtime scenes focus heavily on reflection: * characters question their choices, * stress manifests as doubt rather than injury, * and the future feels heavy rather than triumphant. The session ends with a sense that every future Sortie will define what kind of crown this is, not just whether it’s won.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)