Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Not part of the conversation, just used as reference to where the next part happens from ===
(Not part of the conversation, just used as reference to where the next part happens from
Captain Blue chose to input all the messages into AI himself, with the exact same starting criteria and the exact same comments going down to where the input ends with "- Having solos teaming that are not cheating will deter a solo cheater from going for them and go for easier solo prey. -Cheaters use code names or methods to communicate like the Tarkov wiggle so they can identify other cheaters and avoid them increasing the odds they will run into you. You keep ignoring all these logical arguments because you just want to look at the on the surface numbers which is just hypocritical because you people have been telling me I'm not looking at the stats with details but he you are doing the thing you claim I do."")

(Conversation continues here)
Captain Blue quotes Loctarjay "I can answer that: He truly think the % of cheaters is higher than 25%"
To which Captain Blue responds:
"You have no evidence to suggest it's any lower.

Here is the video of the unedited chat GPT conversation of Loctar before he some how wiped all the messages I put in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fzM3206LxI"

Loctarjay watches that video and responds with:
I just went through your video, and at 3:17 you are writing something that does NOT exist in the conversation at all.......

YOU WRITE:
"I JUST realized that your probability is demanding you meet every 18 enemy every single match" This is incorrect, the conversation was stated about having a cheater in your game not running into the cheater. The following probability assumes you run into only 1 player. But Loctar doesn't have a basis for how many players you could run into due to map size or objectives that could push people together or apart. There are too many variables to correctly determine how many people you run into. However that's not the point. It's not about running into a cheater but how many are in the game with you. Then from there we could make a few logical assumptions such as the more players you kill would increase the odds of running into potentially 1 out of 3 cheaters. Moving to high loot areas or common quest areas could also increase the chances of running into a cheater. The cheater themselves would kill faster and move around more efficiently due to confidence and wall hacks further increasing odds of running into a cheater. There also some more logical assumptions although many may consider them reaching or not plausible. That being code names that cheaters could use such as _ - , <3 or other symbols used by generated accounts that get sold to cheaters. These names could be used to ignore other cheaters in the game if there were any, causing a greater chance to run into a cheater. "Loctarjay accurately questions the reliability of outdated anticheat studies and potential marketing bias."
While this is true this isn't the only evidence that exists. We have ban information from game devs and research into the profits of of cheat sellers. AL of which suggest that cheating is quite high. This is actually just Loctar cherry picking information as he chooses to skewer perception of Captain Blue to appear not credible. Also on the other hand there is no data to confirm a lesser amount of cheaters say 5%. So while he can argue against certain data or claim it's marketing cheating is well known to worse than it's ever ben due to advancements in cheating such as DMA and AI cheats, even overlays that are near undetectable. Loctar is basically trying to make a case that cheating basically hardly exists at all. When the prupose of my original claim was to show how few people need to be cheating in a game like ARC raiders or a Battle Royale to cause the problems for legit players."
(End of Captain Blue's purposely constructed message to the AI, which drastically changed the result afterwards, which also the the very thing he did NOT show in the screenshots because he knew exactly what he did at this moment)

Even though THAT was an insanely long message to rewrite because I cannot simply copy/paste it here, I still find it relevant for the fact that Captain Blue claims that I did some magical input that changed it in my favor, while it truly was HIM that made changes to the prompt... And don't you worry Captain Blue, I will now add my entire comment here into the AI-chat too and get a further analysis, and I will even give you the result in a message right after"