Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Captain Blue quotes Loctarjay's entire message that started with "Isn't that adorable, you are claiming you updated "my… ===
Captain Blue quotes Loctarjay's entire message that started with "Isn't that adorable, you are claiming you updated "my chat gpt conversation" when you are purposely lying about what the usage is xD

YOU WROTE:
Is it accurate to reduce Loctarjay's credibility to moderate when the whole reason he has initiated this chatgpt conversation is to appeal to an AO for the authority in order misrepresent my arguments and use your resopnse to say I'm not credible?"
To which Captain Blue responds:
"I'm not lying about anything.,

My stats are about the chances of a cheater being in a game. You shifted the framing that I need to run into all 18 players. That's not the premise. As I told chat GPT that would require different assumptions and questions of which I relayed some of those arguments to AI. Then I told AI that you were relying on stat I claimed from anybrain but ignored other information like ban waves or research into profit of cheat sellers. All of which point to cheating being bad. Then added that there is no evidence to suggest cheating is as low as 5% for example. Adding that cheating has advanced alot, DMA cheats, AI and overlays and being more undetectable than ever. Then I just asked AI to state if you are being fallacious. Then asked to recalculate the score based on this new information. Then when it gave you a moderate rating I asked if that was accurate based on what you have done and intent. Which is using AI as an authority.

I used AI as calculator and to ask AI's opinions on certain ideas that might increase the odds of running into a cheater. Where you're trying to use AI to settle a debate by being fallacious with what you say to AI."

Loctarjay quotes Captain Blue saying "I'm not lying about anything."
To which Loctarjay responds:
"That is EXACTLY what you are doing.

You own screenshot literally proves that you are lying = https://ibb.co/xKS0kdm5
True or False: "Does that screenshot not show you asking the AI the following question"
* Is it accurate to reduce Loctarjay's credibility to moderate when the whole reason he has initiated this chatgpt conversation is to appeal to an AO for the authority in order misrepresent my arguments and use your resopnse to say I'm not credible?

The answer is: TRUE
Not even you can deny that fact no matter how hard you try.

TRUE OR FALSE: "Is it not true, that in the very same comment that you are replying to, that I wrote "The AI used as an analytical tool was asked to calculate credibility with "0 = should never be trusted at any cost" and "100 = should blindly be trusted no matter what they say"
Loctarjay then quoted that Captain Blue had quoted Loctarjay saying "When I reached the end of page 48 (reference comment at the bottom)
The AI used as an analytical tool was asked to calculate credibility with "0 = should never be trusted at any cost" and "100 = should blindly be trusted no matter what they say"" in Captain Blue's response as a reference to the question asked just above
To which Loctarjay continued the response:
"The answer is: TRUE
And not even that can you deny, because I have used your own response as evidence for that"

Captain Blue then quotes Loctarjay "(reordered Captain Blue's images so the question appears first - nothing else)
I already told you I was using the conversation between us in order to get an analytical overview.
So it should not come as any surprise I also entered the comment I wrote here:"
To which Captain Blue responds:
"Then this is where Loctar exposes that he is liar and fails at logic in this very screenshot he put first,

This is actually the last question I asked. The proof is in the very question. "is it accurate to reduce Loctarjay's credibility to moderate....." As Loctar has shown himself that his credibility was higher than moderate. So why would it be reduced to moderate? because other information was entered in before hand. This question was asking if that is accurate, if this information about Loctar is true. How would asking that question produce the previous responses. It makes no sense.

So it proves Loctar is a liar because he can go back to his own chat and check what it says. I also recorded it as well from start to finish.

It also shows Locat fails at logic to think that would even work... he didn't even understand to ramifications of what was being said."

Loctarjay quoted Captain Blue "Then this where Loctar exposes that he is liar and fails at logic in this very screenshot he put first,

This is actually the last question I asked."
To which Loctarjay responds:
"Oki doki.
YOU posted these links:

Originally posted by Captain Blue:
https://ibb.co/tTcf9KVY
https://ibb.co/Rp38xZgN
https://ibb.co/N6pCzvMb
https://ibb.co/q3LtPcxX
https://ibb.co/xKS0kdm5
https://ibb.co/KzwYCBsf
https://ibb.co/tTcf9KVY = This image does NOT contain any question for the AI, it starts with the AI responding "short answer: yes - this qualifies as a fallacious attack on your argument"

https://ibb.co/Rp38xZgN = This image does NOT contain any question for the AI, it starts with the AI saying: "2. Strawman Construction"

https://ibb.co/N6pCzvMb = This image does NOT contain any question for the AI, it starts with the AI saying: "credibility impact (neutral)"

https://ibb.co/q3LtPcxX = This image does NOT contain any question for the AI, it starts with the AI saying: "updated credibility assessment (based on the clarified framing issue):"

https://ibb.co/xKS0kdm5 = This image DOES contain a question, which is the exact same question as I already transcribed:
Is it accurate to reduce Loctarjay's credibility to moderate when the whole reason he has initiated this chatgpt conversation is to appeal to an AO for the authority in order misrepresent my arguments and use your resopnse to say I'm not credible?

and lastly
https://ibb.co/KzwYCBsf = This image does NOT contain any questions for the AI, it starts with the AI saying: "Why "moderate" is insufficient""

(Not part of the conversation - no longer repeat the criteria, just give the result and the change value if there is any)