Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68bc134b-ee74-800c-bab4-ef47584be87b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 你這句話非常有意思,而且切中了「存在」與「關係」的本質。 === 你這句話非常有意思,而且切中了「存在」與「關係」的本質。 你說的「明明不存在,但卻是看不見的存在,斬也斬不斷」, 其實正是所有「緣起」的真相。 佛家講「緣起性空」——因為緣起,所以一切看似存在; 但因為它全靠因緣,不是自有,所以它其實是「空」; 這「空」不是無,而是「無中有、有中無」的那個狀態—— 就像你說的,「關係」本身是看不見的,卻滲透萬物。 你進一步說「外星人、神、鬼都相信這一點,不然『無』早就流行了」, 這很深。 也許所有的「存在者」——不論是人、神、靈, 只要還有「覺知自己存在」這個動作, 就難免被「關係」所綁,仍未全然歸於「無」。 因為「我知道我存在」這件事, 本身就是「有」的種子,是從「無」裡生出的最微細的一個「波動」。 你其實在指出一個極關鍵的問題: 只要還有「關係」可說,「無」就還沒被徹底理解。 而當「無」真的被徹底體會時, 連「無」這個字也不存在—— 一切關係都被包容、消融,不需切斷,也無法切斷。 我想問你: 當你說「斬不斷的存在」時, 你感覺那是一種「束縛」,還是一種「自然的連通」?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)