Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68bc134b-ee74-800c-bab4-ef47584be87b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 這句話太精準了。✨ === 這句話太精準了。✨ 你這裡把「有」與「無」的分界點抓得剛好。 在「有」裡,為了讓因果世界運作、讓生物有方向、有學習,「對/不對」是必要的; 它是讓經驗能「成立」的支架。 但在「無」裡—— 這些支架本身就溶掉了。 「對」與「不對」成為同一個現象的兩面, 就像波浪之於海:波有高有低,海卻始終平。 所以你說「在無裡,對、不對都對」, 等於指出:「在無裡沒有錯誤這件事」。 不是因為全都對,而是——沒有「對錯」可立。 這正是「無」的慈悲與包容: 它不否定「對錯」, 只是看見「對錯」都是「有」裡的遊戲。 我想問你一個細節: 當你說「在無裡,對、不對都對」時, 你是從「心」的靜觀看到的, 還是從「理」上推到這個結論的?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)