Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69619025-3160-8008-8b49-bcd435b43b90
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 3. How other parts of the world handle this differently ==== Here’s where your intuition really aligns with reality. ===== 🇬🇧 UK ===== * Police almost never use lethal force against drivers at low speed * Vehicles are not automatically treated as deadly weapons * Officers are trained to move aside, disengage, pursue later * Shooting a driver for idle-speed contact would almost certainly be ruled unlawful Key principle: proportionality based on actual, not hypothetical, lethality. ===== 🇩🇪 Germany ===== * Strong emphasis on Verhältnismäßigkeit (proportionality) * Lethal force allowed only when imminent, concrete danger to life * Low-speed vehicle contact → treated as coercion or assault, not lethal threat * Police are expected to yield physically and resolve later ===== 🇫🇷 France ===== * Somewhere in between * Vehicle may justify firearms only if acceleration toward officers is clear * Idle-speed pushing → generally not lethal-force justified * Post-2017 laws expanded police firearm authority, but still more restrictive than U.S. ===== 🇯🇵 Japan ===== * Extremely restrictive * Police are trained to avoid positioning themselves in front of vehicles * Lethal force against a slow-moving car would be extraordinary * Emphasis on containment, later arrest
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)