Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/696002bf-f8c0-8012-a9c4-bef20a6e12cd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short answer: No — Maozim is not the Kabbalistic Ein Sof. === Short answer: No — Maozim is ''not'' the Kabbalistic ''Ein Sof''. They are fundamentally opposite concepts, even though both are abstract and non-anthropomorphic. ==== What Ein Sof actually is (Kabbalah) ==== Ein Sof (אֵין סוֹף) means “Without End” / “Infinite.” Core features: * Absolute, infinite God beyond comprehension * Beyond power, beyond form, beyond force * Not worshiped directly — unknowable in essence * Manifests only indirectly through the Sefirot (wisdom, mercy, justice, etc.) * Associated with overflowing being, not domination In Jewish thought, Ein Sof is God before God is “named.” ==== What Maozim is (Daniel 11) ==== Maozim means strongholds / fortresses / power. Biblical characteristics: * Finite * Instrumental * Funded with gold and treasure * Relies on force, security, violence * A replacement for God, not God beyond knowing Daniel explicitly frames Maozim as: : “a god his fathers did not know” That disqualifies Ein Sof, which is deeply rooted in Israel’s theology (even if later systematized). ==== Why people confuse them ==== There are surface-level similarities that cause confusion: | Similarity | Why it’s misleading | | ------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | Abstract | One is infinite being, the other finite power | | Non-personal | One is transcendent holiness, the other functional force | | No image | One rejects images because it’s too high; the other because it’s too low | Abstract ≠ the same. ==== The key difference (this matters) ==== Ein Sof transcends power. Maozim absolutizes power. Put sharply: * Ein Sof → God beyond force * Maozim → force made god Or in biblical language: * Ein Sof aligns (at least conceptually) with “I AM” * Maozim aligns with “might makes right” ==== One-sentence verdict ==== Ein Sof is infinite divinity beyond all strength; Maozim is finite strength falsely treated as divinity. They point in opposite spiritual directions. If you want, I can: * Compare Ein Sof vs. Logos (John 1) * Show how Daniel → Revelation → Beast power develops the Maozim idea * Or translate this contrast into a dark apocalyptic lyric / chant the way you usually do Just say the word.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)