Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69191dd5-6360-800d-b47b-7ebcc8b69dc8
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== This is the core “is it worth it?” question. ==== ===== Pros: ===== * Peak capability: 400B dense Transformer gives you: - Better long-tail reasoning. - Higher knowledge capacity. - Better few-shot / zero-shot across obscure edge cases. * Single foundation: One massive model that you can: - Fine-tune. - Distill into smaller students (including hybrids like Zebra-Llama). * Rubin stack: VR-200 + CPX + Kyber interconnect are optimized for: - NVFP4 / FP8 training. - Disaggregated prefill/decode. - Huge context inference at massive scale. NVIDIA Newsroom<ref>{{cite web|title=NVIDIA Newsroom|url=https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-unveils-rubin-cpx-a-new-class-of-gpu-designed-for-massive-context-inference|publisher=NVIDIA Newsroom|access-date=2025-11-16}}</ref> Cons: * Capex + opex are astronomical. * Ultra high power density / cooling requirements (1 MW-class racks). * You only do this for a handful of foundation models globally. ===== Pros: ===== * Training cost: - 1–2 orders of magnitude fewer tokens. - ~10⁴× less GPU-compute vs 400B pre-train. * Inference efficiency: - KV-cache shrunk by 10–30× → dramatically better tokens/W and memory/W for long context. arXiv<ref>{{cite web|title=arXiv|url=https://arxiv.org/html/2505.17272v1|publisher=arxiv.org|access-date=2025-11-16}}</ref> - Fits nicely with MI450X’s huge 432 GB HBM4 per GPU; you can hold many concurrent sequences or long contexts per device. * Deployment flexibility: - Easy to spin up per-customer / per-workload models. - Post-training cycles measured in hours–days, not weeks. - You can saturate Helios racks with hundreds of such jobs over time. Cons: * You’re capped at 1–8B (today) – far below 400B. * Quality is bounded by: - The teacher’s capabilities. - The hybridization & distillation quality. * For frontier-level reasoning / generality, they complement but don’t entirely replace a 400B class foundation.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)