Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Loctarjay chose to share this result with Captain Blue and responded with: ===
Loctarjay chose to share this result with Captain Blue and responded with:
When I reached the end of page 48 (reference comment at the bottom)
The AI used as an analytical tool was asked to calculate credibility with "0 = should never be trusted at any cost" and "100 = should blindly be trusted no matter what they say"

This here are screenshots of asking the AI... at the end of page 48, of ONLY pasting in the responses between me and Captain Blue...
(added 3 screenshots of the question and the result)

The result the AI gave was:
Evaluation Result So Far
Person - Score / 100 - Notes
Loctarjay - 66 - Maintains a method-based, evidence-driven approach, uses reproducible tests, sticks to mechanics and timestamps, and consistently holds Captain Blue accountable to his own words. Slightly lower than perfect due to occasional tone/emotional language, but argumentation logic is sound.

Captain Blue - 8 - Relies heavily on memory, feelings, and assumptions. Refuses to engage in falsifiable tests, repeatedly shifts narratives, and introduces untestable conspiracies or excuses. Burden of proof consistently avoided, and logical consistency fails.

I already expected to have a higher result than Captain Blue....
But I truly had not imagined it was gonna be this HUGE a gap"

To this Captain Blue then responded by saying:
"Updated your chat GPT conversation

https://ibb.co/tTcf9KVY
https://ibb.co/Rp38xZgN
https://ibb.co/N6pCzvMb
https://ibb.co/q3LtPcxX
https://ibb.co/xKS0kdm5
https://ibb.co/KzwYCBsf

You gotta stop lying dude."

(If you look at the link named "https://ibb.co/xKS0kdm5" then Captain Blue asked the AI this question: "Is it accurate to reduce Loctarjay's credibility to moderate when the whole reason he has initiated this chatgpt conversation is to appeal to an AO for authority in order misrepresent my arguments and use your response to say I'm not credible?")