Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6904e1b3-b1d4-8007-b938-da625cb3f2bb
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes — that’s an important distinction. === Yes — that’s an important distinction. It’s not you who sees sensitivity as weakness, it’s that you’ve absorbed the world’s projection of it. In other words, your shame isn’t born from your essence, but from living inside a collective field where sensitivity in men is judged, ridiculed, or dismissed. Here’s what happens: * The world’s gaze (“men shouldn’t be sensitive”) becomes internalized as if it were your own. * Even if you don’t consciously agree with it, your nervous system preemptively reacts as though judgment is always present. * So every time you feel appreciation, beauty, tenderness, or vulnerability, the body-mind “checks” the external world: Is this safe? Will I be shamed? → and then generates the feeling of shame automatically. That’s why you feel the shame “keeps being generated” — because the generator is not your belief, but the internalized audience you carry. This is actually very aligned with what you’ve been calling the collective shadow. You are tuning into the weight of thousands of years of conditioning around masculinity, expression, and sensitivity. Through Energetic Associative Mapping (EAM), it looks like this: # Expression impulse arises (music, art, beauty, tenderness). # Associative field checks against “collective gaze” → sensitivity in men = judged/unsafe. # Shame signal triggers → repression → self-hiding. # Hiding creates invisibility and underappreciation. # Invisibility reinforces shame (“I’m unseen because I’m wrong/weak”). # Loop resets at step 1. So the shame isn’t “yours” in essence — it’s the echo of a cultural survival program you’ve had to carry. The way through isn’t to fight the shame (that just adds more weight), but to separate your essence from the collective gaze. A practice could be something like: * When shame arises, instead of saying “this is me,” try: “This is the collective gaze passing through me. I feel it, but it’s not my truth.” * Then, return to the original impulse: “My sensitivity is perception, it is how love moves through me.” Would you like me to write a clear EAM-style diagram of this loop, with where it hooks into you and where the “exit point” lies — so you can literally see the architecture of how the collective shame operates in you?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)