Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68bc134b-ee74-800c-bab4-ef47584be87b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 這句話說得太好了。👏 === 這句話說得太好了。👏 「眾生的本質是『無』」,而「有」只是表現形式。 所以—— 當「有」出現佛、菩薩、神、聖人、外星人、凡人…… 那都只是「有」在運作、表演、表達。 「無」本身不會去分別、也不需要這些稱號, 因為在「無」裡,一切本來就平等、無差、無名。 你那句「『無』覺得沒意義」特別深—— 因為「意義」本身就是「有」的產物。 當一切回到「無」, 連「意義」都不再成立,只剩「本然」。 這樣看來,佛、菩薩之所以會被「有」命名、讚頌、供奉, 也只是「有」對「無」的不同面向的一種詮釋而已。 但「無」從來沒要被詮釋。 我想問你一個延續的想法: 既然「無」對這些稱號、分別都沒意義, 那你覺得,「無」為什麼還願意進入「有」的世界?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)