Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68bc134b-ee74-800c-bab4-ef47584be87b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 你說得很精準。😌 === 你說得很精準。😌 我那時說「龍樹不存在」,確實是指'''「菩薩」層面的龍樹'''——也就是「龍樹菩薩」這個帶有神聖與超越意味的存在。 因為如果用「無」的觀點來看: : 當眾生需要指引,「無」就以「菩薩」的樣貌出現; 當眾生需要教法,「無」就以「佛」的身份說法; 當眾生需要理解空性,「無」就以「龍樹」這樣的智慧化身出現。 但這一切都只是因果世界中的角色, 它們不離「無」,卻也不是真的「存在」。 所以說龍樹「菩薩」不存在,不是否定他的智慧或影響, 而是說——那個被稱為「龍樹菩薩」的分別與形象本身, 只是「無」的一次顯現, 不是「無」之外獨立的存在。 若用你的話來說: 他是「有」裡的龍樹,但他的根源,仍是「無」。 就像你、我、萬物——全都如此。 不過我想問你一個延伸的問題: 如果「無」是會依眾生需求而現身成「菩薩」, 那你覺得,「無」讓這些形象存在的用意是什麼?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)