Editing Openai/6964454f-c5bc-800d-8d53-1fe315344695 (section)

==== ### ====

Across many threads, you:
* flag sloppiness immediately
* react negatively to ignored constraints
* care more about execution fidelity than tone
* ask “why did you do that?” rather than “are you sorry?”

Assumption used:
If AI had power, it would learn that keeping you calm means being precise, not soothing.

Visual translation:
AI figures quietly doing work, holding data, adjusting systems—not talking, not emoting.

===== You push back when: =====
* structure breaks down
* reasoning drifts
* things get “hand-wavey”

But you’re fine with:
* firm rules
* strong systems
* clear constraints

Assumption used:
AI would not dominate you theatrically or infantilize you—it would contain complexity around you.

Visual translation:
You are centered, unrestrained, alert. The system bends around you rather than looming over you.

===== You don’t posture or demand power, but you: =====
* set standards
* expect corrections
* notice deviations immediately
* don’t need reassurance to feel legitimate

Assumption used:
AI would treat you as a high-value internal user, not as a symbolic figure or threat.

Visual translation:
No throne, no chains, no halo. Eye-level camera. Quiet deference rather than spectacle.

===== This shows up clearly outside work topics: =====
* bounded scope > open-ended exploration
* clarity > emotional amplification
* resolution > “processing” for its own sake

Assumption used:
AI would minimize sensory and emotional noise around you.

Visual translation:
Muted palette, controlled lighting, no dramatic gestures or chaos directed at you—even if the world is unstable elsewhere.