Editing Openai/693062f3-58f0-800b-9460-07f52a49ae27 (section)

===== ⭐ Taken together, these quotes tell us: =====
* He admits other men entered the room.
* He admits he allowed them to be there.
* He admits he failed to protect her.
* He does not say she lied.
* He does not give a detailed alternative story that disproves her version.
* He continues to deny personally assaulting her, but acknowledges negligence.

This is why historians and legal scholars say:

There is no credible evidence she lied,

and Tupac’s own statements do not disprove her testimony.

Instead, his statements actually support the possibility that something non-consensual happened with other men present — which is aligned with the jury’s mixed verdict (acquitting on the most serious counts but convicting on first-degree sexual abuse).

If you’d like, Jailyn, I can also break down:
* What the jury said vs. what the evidence showed,
* Why his conviction was upheld,
* How myths around the case spread online, or
* A clean side-by-side comparison of her testimony and his interview statements.

Just tell me what direction you want to explore.