Editing Openai/68acd283-ffd0-8007-a41f-aba460e3dd99 (section)

=== Assistant: Done. ===
Done. I reran both models with your new speeds and built full tables for every height from 1 to 10 ft:
* Head seas at 6 kn
* Following seas at 7 kn

You’ve got, per height:
* Baseline T = H seconds (to match your earlier “2/2, 4/4, 6/6” style)
* Comfortable minimum period where H/L ≤ 0.04
* Deep-water wavelength, steepness, encounter period, and a relative 0–10 misery/workload index

Open the tables in the UI above, and if you want the raw files:
* Download head seas CSV<ref>{{cite web|title=Download head seas CSV|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/Download%20head%20seas%20CSV|publisher=Download head seas CSV|access-date=2025-12-22}}</ref>
* Download following seas CSV<ref>{{cite web|title=Download following seas CSV|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/Download%20following%20seas%20CSV|publisher=Download following seas CSV|access-date=2025-12-22}}</ref>

Reading it without a headache:
* In head seas @ 6 kn, the worst pain lives at short periods. At the comfortable T_min line, relative misery rises with height because encounter spacing is still tight.
* In following seas @ 7 kn, short period with T = H is twitchy at small heights (you overtake a lot of tiny waves). As period lengthens to T_min, workload grows mostly with height and settles into a steadier rhythm. Watch V/c near 1.0 for surfing/broach potential; longer periods make c faster, which brings V/c down.

Want me to add quartering and beam seas next, or fold in your boat’s actual polar speeds per TWA so the encounter math matches your sail plan instead of my generic 6/7 kn assumptions?