Editing Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277 (section)

=== User: Look at the prompts he gives. ===
Look at the prompts he gives. This is just an example of the last few, but he stages the platform in a cunning decieptfull way, because Grok is not allowed to comment on the truth about viruses, he can only act as referee that is groomed into making comments that support a lie.
I know it is politically incorrect to say someone is a liar, but I have no other way of describing what Paul / Ken are doing.
He is intelligent enough to grasp the information needed to understand the concepts of modern nano-tech revelations, but he never enquires about them. His only task is to purposely support and promote a false narrative. I can't think of any other way of describing him other than, "he is a liar". 🤷

---------
He's also clearly lying by omission to ChatGPT, presenting only his point of view to get it to make the false claims shown in the latest pic I shared; another attempt to mislead the reader. We should note that in there too!
Can we fairly call him a despicable cheat in there too to sum up?
Can you give that a more formal tone ... a correction from a Judge now rather than a ref?
Can oyu format that to make it look more formal too?
-------------