Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695c331c-3c14-800b-a892-d2ac684b6ae9
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Good — this is the right place to get stuck. === Good — this is the right place to get stuck. If legitimacy feels fuzzy, it’s because it’s neither emotional nor physical, yet it reliably moves both. That’s why people argue past each other about it. Let’s pin it down cleanly. ==== - ❌ Not respect (you can hate someone and still accept their authority) ==== * ❌ Not power (you can obey someone who can’t physically hurt you) * ❌ Not morality (people follow immoral systems all the time) So yeah — it feels fake until you see what it actually does. ==== Legitimacy = a shared rule in your head that says: ==== “Resistance will cost me ''more'' than compliance in the long run.” Not emotionally. Not physically. Cognitively. It’s a belief about future consequences. That’s it. ==== Power says: ==== : Respect says: : Legitimacy says: : You comply before force is used because your brain simulates the future and says: : ==== ### ==== No cop. No camera. No one watching. Yet most people stop. * No immediate power * No respect for the sign * Legitimacy: “Rules apply even when unseen.” That’s internalized enforcement. ===== A judge can ruin your life with a pen. ===== A mugger needs a knife. Why does the judge win? * Not fear * Not love * System-backed inevitability You’re not afraid of the judge — you’re afraid of everything that follows. ===== Why does a 16-year-old still listen (sometimes)? ===== * Parent has no power * Teen may have no respect But: : Legitimacy = anticipated downstream pain. ==== At the animal layer, legitimacy vanishes. ==== A lion doesn’t recognize titles. A gunfight doesn’t care about laws. That’s why: * War zones collapse legitimacy * Prisons run on power + respect only * Extreme poverty erodes rule-following Legitimacy requires: * Time * Memory * Predictable systems Take those away, and yes — it dies. So you weren’t wrong. You were just zoomed too far in. ==== Here’s one you can actually work with: ==== : Not emotion. Not violence. Expectation. ==== Power enforces compliance once. ==== Legitimacy enforces compliance forever. That’s why empires care more about legitimacy than fear. Fear is expensive. Legitimacy is scalable. And when legitimacy cracks? Power suddenly has to work overtime — that’s when shit gets ugly. You’re not confused. You’re dissecting the operating system instead of the app. If you want, we can now: * Collapse this into a single survival rule * Map it onto addiction, gangs, or prison hierarchies * Or test where legitimacy breaks first in real societies Your instincts are solid — you’re just demanding definitions that don’t lie.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)