Editing Openai/69557275-0da8-8004-a03a-8eb02e10a61f (section)

=== User: Okay, you got... ===
Okay, you got... we have now in this conversation a lot of good stuff. And I don't think we can get any further without me giving you line edits. So I'm going to work off the last 14 crazy predictions. I'm going to give you edits on each of those, and then I'm going to go quickly through the previous conversation to see if there's anything else it looks like we're missing. So, which U is speaking? I like that one. I think that that one's good. 1 and 2 are good. For compute... I like it, but this one, I honestly don't know. I would like you to do... we're not writing a research paper, but do a little bit more analysis on here to understand. I just... order of magnitude. What actually is this sort of thing likely to cost at current economics projected forward? And at what point does it become expensive? And how does the cost function work? I want to put more example dollar numbers in there, but I don't want it to be completely made up. So, let's get rid of the risk shadow one. The privacy becomes a lifestyle. I like it, but it doesn't feel very human. Try to maybe rethink the example in terms of how that manifests. Borrow competence, you're going too far here because you're doing some sort of super futuristic thing where the competence comes directly to my mind. What I think is much more interesting is that I can have my AI borrow competence from an expert trained AI model, but it's probably your example here isn't right. It's probably not going to be just plumbing. What I would like you to do is kind of pick an example where I'm using AI to solve a difficult problem, and then there's a proprietary trained AI model and I can borrow AI competence from that. My AI can borrow that. Think through what that example would look like for an average person. I don't know if it'd be like medical research or some hard problem they're trying to solve, but because what you're doing is too futuristic. I want you to think a little bit about the dead. I think there's something with the dead, but you linger administratively. It's a little bit weird. I want you to think a little bit from human first principles around what's the best way to articulate a prediction around AI and the dead. Nine, I think has some potential, but I think it feels a little bit too black mirror. And I also, I think it's two or three leaps forward. I want to think more about how are people going to be using AI in the next year around social life, getting a truth overlay. And it's going to be a little bit clunkier than what you prescribe, but I think it'll be more real and meaningful. Conversation gyms, I just don't get that because it's like, why can't I just do that at home? I don't understand the value add there. Again, a gear shift button for arguments. I think this feels too distant. Is there any way you can capture that in more of like, what's this going to look like in 2026 or 2027? Because it's a, what are people going to do? There's this messy middle, you're going full black mirror on a lot of these and people are already familiar with the full black mirror and they're familiar with where we are now, but there's this weird messy middle that we're going to have a year or two from now. And I want to really paint more what that's going to look like. Truth comes with warranties. I love that. I want you to just think about that a little bit more, how that would actually manifest because it feels a little fluffy right now. Nostalgia becomes editable. I want you to think about the idea of, remember the game Second Life. I wonder, are a lot of your ideas is a middle ground, like some sort of second life experience here where, with AI and PCs that becomes magnetic or something about more people playing video games. I'm saying a lot of stuff. Here's the thing. I am giving you output as a human respondent of what's interesting. I do not, I want you to be responsible for your predictions and what you think is true. These are meant to be your predictions of earning an article on GPT's predictions. What I'm trying to do is give you a human lens as to what's interesting, what's not, what my pushback is. And then I want you to take that and ultimately decide what your and the handwriting, I'm not sure about that because I think AI can actually is going to be able to read handwriting. But I love the idea of trying to figure out what the new analog looks like and thinking through that more detail. Now I'm just going to go back to some of your other. I love the, you had this line about send me your agent. I really like that. I wonder if there's some way we could bring that back in. You can smell when a message was optimized. Let's do more of that in the second and third order impacts of the idea of people receiving a lot of AI communications and how it subtly changes this. And then you had another one around speaking in prompts. I really like that. But again, I want to be more subtle and thoughtful around how the use of AI will impact the way that humans speak to each other. You called that prompt speak. Okay, let's go with that for now.