Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/692596ae-427c-800c-903a-fe6f67c1d76a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Here is a more detailed outline with some sample text for key sections, translating your discussion into academic / paper style. ==== ===== Draft (sample): ===== : ===== Key Goals: ===== * Introduce the problem. * State why current conceptions of information/reality are limited. * Present your thesis. * Sketch your approach. Draft (sample): : ===== Outline: ===== * Review of Shannon information & its limitations * Philosophical roots: substance metaphysics, relational ontology * Why we need a new theory Draft (sample): : ===== This is the heart of the paper. You will carefully define your formalism. ===== Outline: * Definition of Object-Universe * Dimensions: Ξ¨, spatial, relational (Ξ) * State-vector: Pβ (probabilities), Tβ (traits) * Coherence: internal, external, global * Evolution (dynamics) equation Draft (sample excerpts): : ===== Here you'll show how the theory works in practice. ===== Outline: * Quantum measurement: double-slit, collapse * Cognition: learning relational links, coherence audit * Social systems: coherence in institutions, coherence collapse in crises * AI: coherence-driven learning, modeling, transparency Draft (sample): : ===== Outline: ===== * Ontological shift: relations over substances * Epistemic shift: information as active construction * Unifying power across domains * Objections & responses - e.g., βis coherence too vague?β - βhow to test coherence?β - βdoes this collapse to known physics?β Draft (sample): : ===== Draft (sample): ===== :
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
