Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/690e0c6e-a0a0-8008-a8d6-170f8b930892
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== B. Friction, Power, and Market Concentration ==== (Accepts the intuition that formal equality ≠ real equality; substitutes market imperfections and power for Marx’s class exploitation.) # Alan Manning, ''Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets'' (Princeton University Press, 2003). — A foundational text on modern monopsony theory showing persistent employer power in “formally free” labour markets. # José Azar, Ioana Marinescu & Marshall Steinbaum, “Labor Market Concentration” Journal of Human Resources, 2022 (earlier NBER WP 24147). — Empirical evidence that U.S. wage levels are 15–20 % lower due to concentration—an empirical analogue of “extraction.” # Jan De Loecker, Jan Eeckhout & Gabriel Unger, “The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications” Quarterly Journal of Economics 135 (2), 2020. — Documents post-1980s mark-up growth and declining labour share; echoes Marx’s idea that capital accumulation reduces labour’s relative claim. # Loukas Karabarbounis & Brent Neiman, “The Global Decline of the Labor Share” Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (1), 2014. — Landmark study linking automation, globalization, and declining labour share — empirical evidence that “formal equality” hides structural shifts.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)