Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6923f6d0-6398-800f-88a6-895979bdbe94
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== ### === * Spinoza: Ethics derived from substance and nature; goal is rational understanding and unity with reality. Geometrical and logical method, with little role for human experience. * School: Ethics arises from human experience, social interaction, and shared understanding. Goal: preserve humanity, justice, the pen, peace, and dignity. * School’s Analysis: Highlights that Spinoza’s approach is less practical and social, emphasizing the school’s focus on ethical pragmatism. ===== - Spinoza: Full awareness, unity with nature, understanding God/substance. ===== * School: Ethical life means enhancing the individual and society, defending human rights, and confronting injustice and hypocrisy. * School’s Analysis: Philosophy without societal and justice links may be beautiful in theory but ineffective in practice. ===== - Spinoza: Emotions must be rationally controlled. ===== * School: Emotions and empathy serve justice and humanity, not merely rational control. * School’s Analysis: Limiting emotions to reason may reduce the capacity to mobilize people for social justice. ===== - Spinoza: Ethics is for elites; immediate broad social impact limited. ===== * School: Ethics should operate in daily life and social interactions to influence society. * School’s Analysis: Without practical and social applicability, even great philosophy cannot create movements or tangible change. ===== - Spinoza: Geometrical reasoning; limited direct and practical critique. ===== * School: Teaching is narrative, inquisitive, and critically engages past and present philosophers, maintaining independence. * School’s Analysis: Enables active engagement with ideas, bringing philosophy into real life, unlike Spinoza’s more individualistic style. ===== 1. Spinoza: Highly coherent and rational, yet abstract and elite-focused; limited immediate social impact. ===== # School: Ethics emerges from experience, society, and real humanity; capable of mobilizing and influencing, combining critique and teaching. # Role of the School: Highlights gap between theory and practice, emphasizes justice and humanity, and demonstrates the necessity of linking philosophy with society. # Conclusion: Both seek moral order and human improvement, but methods, tools, and impacts differ; the school complements and completes Spinoza’s philosophy in real life.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)