Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6945b8b5-5788-8000-9352-d5062c255aa0
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: The direction of Earth’s rotation does not stop the argument — and this is where the reasoning breaks. === The direction of Earth’s rotation does not stop the argument — and this is where the reasoning breaks. I’ll keep this strictly physical and directional, no analogies. ==== 1. Direction acknowledged ==== Earth rotates west → east. So: * London and Las Vegas both already have an eastward velocity * The air above them also already has that same eastward velocity No disagreement there. ==== 2. The decisive point (this cannot be bypassed) ==== A plane’s 500 mph is measured relative to the air, not relative to Earth’s axis or space. That means: * Eastbound flight: Plane = (air’s eastward speed) + 500 mph * Westbound flight: Plane = (air’s eastward speed) − 500 mph But the destination land is also moving eastward at the same base speed as the air. So the only speed that matters for closing the distance is: : ±500 mph relative to the destination The rotation direction cancels out because it is shared. ==== 3. Why “direction” does not create asymmetry ==== For rotation direction to make one flight necessarily longer, one of the following would have to be true: * The plane detaches from the atmosphere ❌ * The destination land is stationary in space ❌ * The air does not co-rotate with Earth ❌ None of these are true. Direction alone does nothing unless velocities are unshared. ==== 4. What would actually make you right ==== You would be correct if planes flew in a non-rotating medium. They do not. That assumption is the only thing holding the conclusion together — and it fails physically. ==== Final, unambiguous statement ==== : Earth can rotate eastward and two opposite-direction flights at the same airspeed can take the same time. : : The rotation direction does not invalidate this — shared motion cancels it. If you want, the next step would be to examine why intuition resists shared-frame physics — that’s where the real confusion usually sits.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)