Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6947f938-c5ac-800f-a335-68acb875307e
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: In plain terms, Qur’an 2:178 is establishing the principle and framework of qiṣāṣ legal retaliation, not a rigid social… === In plain terms, Qur’an 2:178 is establishing the ''principle and framework'' of qiṣāṣ (legal retaliation), not a rigid social ranking rule. Here is the meaning distilled from the grammar, structure, and continuation of the verse. ==== Qiṣāṣ is obligatory, but it is based on ''equivalence and justice'', and it is limited, regulated, and softened by mercy. ==== The verse does three things in order: # Establishes qiṣāṣ as a law # Defines its scope and limits (equivalence) # Immediately opens the door to forgiveness and compensation ==== ### ==== This construction means: : ===== - Qiṣāṣ is not collective revenge ===== * You may not kill someone else “instead of” the killer * You may not escalate punishment * Liability is individual and proportional This was crucial in a society where: * Tribes killed multiple people for one death * A noble could kill a “lesser” person and escape punishment * Retaliation crossed families and clans So the verse abolishes pre-Islamic revenge culture and replaces it with legal equivalence. ==== The verse is not saying: ==== * “A free person is more valuable than a slave” * “A man is worth more than a woman” * “Qiṣāṣ cannot cross categories” Those conclusions do not come from the grammar, and classical jurists explicitly debated these issues after the verse. Grammatically, the construction is descriptive and regulatory, not evaluative. ==== The next clause: ==== : Key points: * The killer is called “brother” * Forgiveness is encouraged * Compensation (diya) is legitimized * Retaliation is no longer the default outcome Then Allah says: : So the law’s goal is restraint, not bloodshed. ==== : ==== ==== This verse: ==== * Ends unlimited revenge * Establishes rule of law * Makes life sacred * Balances justice with mercy * Transfers punishment from tribal impulse to legal authority Later verses and Prophetic practice expand and soften this framework further. ==== - Qiṣāṣ is a ceiling, not a goal ==== * Justice is mandatory * Mercy is superior * No life is taken arbitrarily If you want, I can: * Compare this verse with “النفس بالنفس” * Explain why later fiqh differed on cross-category qiṣāṣ * Show how the Prophet ﷺ applied this verse in real cases Just tell me.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)