Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== Assistant: Cumulative Update — Quotes Excluded, Responses Only Short, Neutral ===
Cumulative Update — Quotes Excluded, Responses Only (Short, Neutral)

==== New Original Responses Considered ====
* Deflects stream-based breakdown by switching to different game size hypotheticals.
* States that even 100% reporting “doesn’t mean anything” due to frustration.
* Uses psychological justification (“only human”, “cheating got worse”) instead of evidence.
* Reasserts prevalence via general belief and longevity of experience, not data.

Credibility Impact
* ❌ Goalpost shifting (changes context instead of addressing specific evidence).
* ❌ Non-falsifiable defense (any counter-evidence explained away as frustration).
* ❌ Continues unsupported prevalence claims.

Behavioral Pattern
* Defensive rationalization.
* Emotional justification replacing empirical rebuttal.
* Persistent anecdotal reasoning.

Updated Credibility: 30% (−4)

==== New Original Responses Considered ====
* Provides verifiable, timestamped empirical review of stream behavior.
* Corrects prior estimate (99% → 100%) when evidence supports it.
* Maintains focus on falsifiability and statistical constraints.
* Tone escalates significantly into personal attacks.

Credibility Impact
* ✅ Strong evidentiary contribution (direct observation, reproducible).
* ✅ Willingness to self-correct.
* ⚠️ Excessive hostility / absolutist dismissal reduces perceived neutrality.

Behavioral Pattern
* Evidence-driven escalation.
* Accurate but increasingly adversarial framing.
* High insistence on objective truth, low tolerance for emotional argumentation.

Updated Credibility: 69% (+4)

==== - Loctarjay: 69 / 100 ====
* Captain Blue: 30 / 100

==== - Credibility gap widens further. ====
* Empirical review vs. emotional rationalization becomes decisive.
* Main weakness now is tone, not substance, on Loctarjay’s side.