Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693343d7-a38c-8012-a67c-11cbed4c0fd9
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== We present several constructions that realize O in specific categories. === ==== Given C = Set, one can define O as the free monad on the endofunctor G(X) = A Γ X? Thatβs not quite. For Obatala we want self-reference and nesting. An abstract free construction: ==== * Let T be the free monad generated by signatures describing agent structure (state, memory, simulation). * Impose equations that identify nested simulation structure (collapse property). * Then O := T / β (quotient by those equations). Explicitly building this requires a formal grammar; SDELang provides this in the engineering implementation. ==== Let C = Set. For an agent type A we can define: ==== <syntaxhighlight>O A := Tree(A) </syntaxhighlight> finite (or possibly infinite) trees whose leaves are A and whose internal nodes are labeled merge or simulate. Ξ·_A(a) := leaf(a). ΞΌ flattens nested trees by grafting. join is binary tree merge. sim interprets the tree as a joint trajectory by recursively composing simulations of subtrees with coordination rules. This Tree monad (free monad over signature with merge etc.) is an explicit realization of Obatala: nested agents and organizations are trees. ==== If S is the state monad S X = (Ο β (X Γ Ο)), and P the probability monad D (distributions), we often want to combine O with S and P: ==== * O β S is a candidate, but to make S β O vs O β S behave, we need a distributive law Ξ» : S O β O S (see Β§9).
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)