Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695f02d3-11f8-800e-993a-ad71db6d42aa
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: This is an important point for cancer vaccines and immunotherapies like GPS, and it’s where a lot of investors and even… === This is an important point for cancer vaccines and immunotherapies like GPS, and it’s where a lot of investors (and even clinicians) get tripped up. I’ll walk through it step-by-step and then tie it directly back to why medians can mislead you. ==== 1️⃣ What “median-based intuition” assumes ==== When people think: : “Treatment median OS is 12.6 months vs control 8 months — that’s a big win” they are implicitly assuming: * The treatment effect starts immediately * The hazard reduction is constant over time * The survival curves separate early and stay separated * The hazard ratio is roughly constant (proportional hazards) That mental model is basically an exponential survival world. This is often wrong for immunotherapy. ==== 2️⃣ What delayed immunotherapy effects actually look like ==== For cancer vaccines and immune-based therapies: ===== Early period (first months) ===== * Immune system is still being primed * Patients may progress or die at similar or even higher rates than control * Survival curves often overlap or cross ===== Later period ===== * A subset of patients mount a durable immune response * Their risk of death drops substantially * A long tail appears in the survival curve This produces: * Non-proportional hazards * A hazard ratio that changes over time ==== 3️⃣ Why medians fail in this situation ==== ===== 🔴 Median OS only reflects the 50th percentile ===== The median is the time when half the patients have died. If: * Many early events happen before the immune benefit kicks in * The benefit is concentrated in a subset of responders Then: * The median may move very little * Even if long-term survival is meaningfully improved ====== Example ====== * Control median OS = 8 months * Treatment median OS = 9 months That looks unimpressive. But… * 2-year OS: - Control = 5% - Treatment = 20% That is a huge clinical benefit — completely invisible at the median. ==== 4️⃣ How this distorts “median → HR” intuition ==== Recall the shortcut: HR≈mCmTHR \approx \frac{m_C}{m_T}HR≈mTmC This assumes: * Constant hazard ratio * No delayed effect But with immunotherapy: * Early HR ≈ 1.0 or >1.0 * Late HR ≪ 1.0 * Overall HR is a weighted average across time So: * Median OS might barely change * Yet the true HR (from Cox/log-rank) can still be favorable * Or the opposite can happen: median improves, but HR misses significance ==== 5️⃣ Visual intuition (very important) ==== ===== Chemotherapy-like curves ===== <syntaxhighlight>Survival | |\ | \ | \ Control | \____ | \____ Treatment +---------------------- Time </syntaxhighlight> * Early separation * Median shifts nicely * HR ≈ median ratio ===== Immunotherapy-like curves ===== <syntaxhighlight>Survival | |\ | \_____ Control | \ | \______ | \_____ Treatment (long tail) +------------------------- Time </syntaxhighlight> * Curves overlap early * Separate late * Median barely moves * Tail drives benefit ==== 6️⃣ Why this matters for statistical testing ==== ===== Cox model & log-rank test ===== * Assume proportional hazards * Lose power when hazards are delayed * Can underestimate benefit for immunotherapy This is why immunotherapy trials increasingly look at: * Landmark survival (e.g., 12-, 18-, 24-month OS) * Restricted mean survival time (RMST) * Piecewise hazard ratios * Milestone survival percentages ==== 7️⃣ REGAL / GPS relevance (without speculating on results) ==== For a WT1-targeted cancer vaccine like GPS: * Mechanistically, benefit would not be immediate * Immune priming + memory formation take time * A subset of patients may derive durable benefit Therefore: * Median OS may be a blunt instrument * HR thresholds derived from medians (like 0.636) may misrepresent true benefit * Long-term OS and tail separation are often more informative This is exactly the pattern historically seen with: * Sipuleucel-T * Checkpoint inhibitors (early days) * Several cancer vaccine programs ==== 8️⃣ One-sentence takeaway ==== : Delayed immunotherapy effects shift benefit into the survival tail, where medians and median-derived intuition break down — making long-term survival metrics far more informative than early median OS. If you want, next we can: * Quantify how much tail benefit is needed to “beat” a weak median * Compare HR vs RMST numerically * Walk through a toy dataset showing median ≈ unchanged but OS benefit is real Just say the word.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)