Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69401093-f800-800a-94fc-a5d69db9f764
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 抽象概念のままだと、結局「何が本質か」で揉めて終わります。したがって、判定軸を固定します。私は次の4分類が最も実装向きだと考えます。 ==== ===== - 海外売上が増えるもの ===== * 知財・標準・ライセンスで外貨が入るもの * 観光や教育のように外貨が国内に落ちるもの * B2B SaaS、製造装置・材料、医療サービス輸出など ===== - 電力、半導体、物流、医療、セキュリティ、災害耐性 ===== * 「ここが詰まると全産業が詰まる」領域 ===== - 行政のデジタル化、医療の効率化、事故減少、詐欺抑止 ===== * 国民の時間と金を奪う摩擦の除去 ===== - AI・半導体・材料・計算資源 ===== * 教育・訓練・研究基盤 この4つのいずれかに明確に寄与する仕事を「本質」と置けば、議論が終わり、配分が始まります。 逆に、どれにも寄与しない(あるいは寄与が弱い)のに過剰肥大している領域は、AIで圧縮し、余剰を移します。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)