Editing Openai/694a9a91-d810-8013-80fe-0c38fdc58984 (section)

=== User: Final sentence of my ECIS review: »This is a kind of paper which presentation I would like to listen to at the ECIS and… ===
Final sentence of my ECIS review: »This is a kind of paper which presentation I would like to listen to at the ECIS and further discuss with the authors during the coffee break. Thus I recommend the acceptance”
Of course, the usual criteria of rigorour, contribution, relevance, clarity previous literature etc. apply and the paper has several issues (outlined in my review) and a long way to go before making a suitable contribution for a journal level publication.
But my main line of thought in GenAI era – Always keep the recipient in mind. 
Will both the audience in Milano and the authors benefit from the presentation/attendance? Is this a paper that is worth 20 minutes of time of the audience?

Disclaimer: My line is from “confidential comments to editors” field, thus this Linkedin post does not break the rules of double blind review