Editing Openai/6921091f-9120-8003-8874-f60fdfc572a6 (section)

=== User: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2024.0281                 as our understanding of potential scenari… ===
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2024.0281                 as our understanding of potential scenarios for the emergence of life advances, we progressively illuminate different regions of the space of possibilities. Current bottom-up approaches to the origins-of-life (OOL) problem have yielded partial, yet highly encouraging, insights. In particular, our knowledge of how diverse interactions between soft matter, protometabolic networks and information-carrying molecules operate is improving rapidly. It is also increasingly clear that explaining the rise of the first cellular replicators will require integrating both evolutionary dynamics and self-organization into theoretical and engineering frameworks [186–190]. In this context, we anticipate that major advances in protocell research may depend on combining evolutionary dynamics with Darwinian selection, an idea strongly supported by the successful evolution of lipid droplets in chemorobotic platforms [35]. The use of morphospaces has also proved valuable since their inception for exploring the limits of the possible. Observed systems tend to cluster along an imaginary axis connecting two opposed vertices, from minimal to maximal cellular complexity. This pattern may suggest that, despite their different origins, the three key components evolve in a synergistic manner. In contrast, empty regions of the morphospace, such as the one shown in figure 2, point to domains of possibilities not occupied by any known system. Why is this so? In some cases, physical or chemical constraints may forbid these regions from being realized. In others, evolutionary processes may have never reached them, perhaps owing to historical contingencies or environmental limitations. 
We close with more questions than answers, but that is the nature of science. Whatever the answers are, they will likely emerge at the crossroads of multiple disciplines and may bring unexpected surprises. // this is very vague vocabulary, provide a strong critique. they try to keep the zombie abiogenesis narrative alive, by using terms, as if more investigation will yield positive naturalistic results, when what we already know, provides enough clarity to reject any naturalistic claims.