Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68b20b12-cee0-8000-91bc-9ae1e0186d28
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: The Farrell vs. === The Farrell vs. DoD case centered on the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy. Before 1993, it was outright illegal for homosexuals to serve in the military. Under DADT (1993–2011), service members were technically allowed to serve—but only under a forced silence. They were “welcomed” so long as they did not disclose their orientation. This distinction matters: under DADT, harassment, discrimination, and assault from heterosexual soldiers were rampant, and there were no safe outlets to report abuse. The numbers also tell a story. Officially, 13,375 service members were discharged under DADT. But this case was stretched back to 1980, inflating the figure to over 35,000. Furthermore, there were attempts to conflate DADT discharges with cases involving transgender individuals who falsified information on applications—a federal offense at the time. This blurs an important fact: between 1993 and 2011, transgender individuals were still classified under “mental disorder” standards, while homosexual service members were uniquely targeted under DADT. The real difference is this: before 1993, homosexuals were simply not allowed in the military at all. Under DADT, they were permitted to serve, but only under a policy of silence—stripped of protections, left vulnerable to abuse, and denied the very equality their service deserved. Can you strengthen this?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)