Editing Openai/69640cff-e5e0-8003-a8d1-a78b118ca18b (section)

=== User: Okay, I read through the entire response thrice, and I am still unconvinced. ===
Okay, I read through the entire response thrice, and I am still unconvinced. 
# Initial question to GPT: "Do not make the mistake of thinking the calculus for the government budget reflects the gains and losses to the economy as a whole." 

This almost always, if not always, devolve into the same story that studies and in this case, an analysis by AI gives out-- more warm bodies in a country = higher GDP. 

I know you say you account for that, but the response doesn't seem to have accounted for it enough. 
# I've heard that so many reports of the fiscal impacts of immigration in the UK simply do not capture many of the programs they use at all. An example that I've seen cited is that almost half of all social housing in London alone is occupied by foreigners, and they get folded into the local council bookkeeping and do not reflect in many fiscal impact studies. True?

Are you truly taking into account all the cornucopia of programs and benefits that immigrants avail themselves? Especially the Boriswave migrants. 
# I am skeptical that “Low-skilled” at entry ≠ “low productivity” forever. If this was true, we'd see and hear of this. Based on what I've read and the direct second hand accounts from those living in the UK I've heard, this seems too good to be true. 

For example, take the typical low-skill immigrant stereotype of recent times: the Deliveroo driver from the Indian subcontinent who came to the UK in 2021 as part of Boriswave. Am I to believe these cohorts have upgraded themselves to a high-income, high-productivity job and continue to do so in large numbers? 

Sounds absolutely fantastical. If so, we'd have heard about it. I'd have heard anecdotally about it.
# Also, I am pretty sure your analysis doesn't take into account all the literature we know of long-term consequences of economic growth a nation's economic and political institutions will be changed by non-WEIRD immigration as shown by Garett Jones. There are so many effects on national wellbeing that diversity and third-world immigration cause on social trust, norms, trust in institutions etc. and these effects remain well beyond the first generation of immigrants. Did you actually take into this into account?