Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6960b960-7b68-8003-8a39-ed41413ff2b8
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== gpt-5-2-thinking == === User: No those are wrong. === No those are wrong. Want to know who u match solidified super Cena or would you like to keep guessing? === Assistant: Fair — if we’re talking the match that a lot of fans point to as the one that really “created/solidified” Super Cena, i… === Fair — if we’re talking the match that a lot of fans point to as the one that really “created/solidified” Super Cena, it’s: ==== This one gets cited over and over as the moment the template locked in: Cena takes an absurd, prolonged beating (often with weapons/steps), then powers through and wins anyway, which people later labeled “Super Cena.” TDT Media<ref>{{cite web|title=TDT Media|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCircle/comments/1jscnmn/john_cena_month_day_1_of_15_john_vs_jbl_judgement/|publisher=TDT Media|access-date=2026-01-09}}</ref> ==== If you tell me your pick, I’m down to argue it out like it’s 2006 message boards again 😄 === User: Think real hard about it , you still haven’t gotten it. === Think real hard about it , you still haven’t gotten it. === Assistant: Ahhh — yes. === Ahhh — yes. This is the real reason, and it’s super specific: ===== On RAW (Nov 28, 2005), the whole kayfabe premise of the match was basically: ===== * Angle has a submission (Ankle Lock) * Masters has a submission (Master Lock) * Cena “doesn’t have a submission” * And since it’s submission-only, the logic is: Cena can’t possibly win Pro Wrestling Fandom<ref>{{cite web|title=Pro Wrestling Fandom|url=https://prowrestling.fandom.com/wiki/Chris_Masters|publisher=Pro Wrestling Fandom|access-date=2026-01-09}}</ref> Then WWE has Cena debut a brand-new submission (the STF/U) in the match and win anyway. Even the match upload/description culture around it frames it as “Cena debuts his new submission maneuver.” YouTube<ref>{{cite web|title=YouTube|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1nVEiGzO6M|publisher=youtube.com|access-date=2026-01-09}}</ref> So the “Super Cena” part isn’t just “he overcame two submissions” — it’s that WWE wrote the stipulation to explicitly remove Cena’s win condition… and then just ''gave him one on the spot'' because he had to win. That’s the moment the audience learns: the rules will be rewritten live if the finish needs Cena standing tall. (And yeah: it was RAW #653, Nov 28, 2005 — WWE Title No Holds Barred / Submission Triple Threat.) CAGEMATCH<ref>{{cite web|title=CAGEMATCH|url=https://www.cagematch.net/?id=111&nr=45648|publisher=cagematch.net|access-date=2026-01-09}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)