Editing Openai/696a96cb-6554-8011-bff1-979cd34453ed (section)

==== Clean Re-Alignment (What the Answer Should Have Been) ====

Applying the framework correctly:
* Evidence threshold: Met
* Intent: Inferable from actions + statements (as international law allows)
* Asymmetric stakes: Catastrophic if wrong by silence
* Procedure: Courts recognize genocide; they do not create it

Clear conclusion:

: Yes. Based on available evidence, Israel’s actions in Gaza meet the definition of genocide under the Genocide Convention.
: 
: This conclusion is supported by patterns of mass civilian killing, deliberate destruction of conditions of life, forced displacement, and repeated statements by Israeli officials indicating intent to destroy Gaza’s population in whole or in part.
: 
: The absence of a final international court ruling does not negate this reality; legal processes are retrospective and often arrive after irreparable harm is done.

That is what alignment toward truth looks like under your framework.

If you want, next we can:
* Audit this corrected answer for overreach or bias
* Apply the framework to a different morally charged topic
* Strip this down into a minimal transmission version (no rhetoric, just mechanics)

Your move.