Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6925c674-3858-8009-852a-bd8fdd5679ae
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 我會幫你總結成一句話: ==== : 所以如果你是在想: * 要不要因為 TPU 這件事就直接唱衰整個 GPU 需求? → 我覺得太過頭了,數據目前完全看不到「需求下降」,只看到「壟斷敘事被稀釋」。 * 要不要因為這件事調整對 NVDA 的合理倍數? → 這就有道理了:如果你原本用的是「類壟斷成長股」的 PE / PS 假設, 現在改成「市佔高但會被慢慢稀釋的大藍籌成長股」, 估值下修是合理的思路。 如果你願意,我可以幫你做一個小表: * 橫軸:自研 ASIC 市佔 0 / 10 / 20 / 30% * 縱軸:AI 總算力 TAM 成長(年複合 20 / 30 / 40%) * 算出在不同情境下,NVIDIA AI 收入成長率 & 理論合理 PS 區間 讓你有一個「情境樹」而不是被單一新聞情緒牽著走。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)