Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68ed2ed1-5644-8004-ba30-42213bf3dbfa
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Take that ~$20 trillion “gross market value” of all global derivatives. ==== If even half of that exposure (say, $10 trillion) sits on balance sheets leveraged 30:1, then a 3–4% adverse move wipes out the equity supporting those positions. That’s how you can have a world where: * The actual losses are only a few trillion, * But the forced deleveraging cascades through tens of trillions in nominal positions. This is why the Bank for International Settlements and central banks obsess over “gross exposures,” collateral flows, and who’s on the other side of what. Because the true danger isn’t “everyone loses their bets” — it’s “everyone tries to unwind their leverage at once.”
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)