Editing Openai/691a2d9f-c044-8012-bccf-942bfce6334d (section)

==== If I translate “Vorbis” into an engineering spec for your comet-refuel ship: ====
# Cultural Layer - The rendezvous schedule is embedded into: - education - ceremonies - myths about “The Crossings” - Missing a crossing is framed as both a technical and moral failure.
# Governance Layer - A dedicated body with: - formal veto on navigation decisions - responsibility for depot upkeep - authority to mobilize resources for critical course corrections
# Technical Layer - Redundant storage of: - orbital parameters - delta-V budgets - worst-case models if a depot is lost - Training cycles that make: - navigators - depot engineers almost “priesthoods”.
# Override Layer - Automated triggers when: - measured ephemeris diverges too far from predicted - depot telemetry shows loss - These force a re-planning ritual instead of letting dogma steamroll reality.

So the practical Vorbis link is:
* You are not just designing hardware (comet powerbanks).
* You’re designing Vorbis-grade institutional and cultural machinery that will keep honoring the physics constraints for many generations.

If you want, we can now sketch:
* a “Vorbis-mode” governance blueprint for a single comet depot (roles, rules, failure cases), or
* a shipboard culture outline that bakes in the rendezvous logic via stories, ranks, and rituals rather than manuals.

Pick which layer you care about more right now: governance, culture, or mission-failure analysis.