Editing Openai/691a2d9f-c044-8012-bccf-942bfce6334d (section)

==== The obvious risk: pure Vorbis logic ignores updated reality. ====
If the comet orbit shifts or a depot is destroyed, a stupidly rigid doctrine could kill everyone.

So you need explicit anti-Vorbis mechanisms:
# Truth override clause - Sensors + nav AI can formally trigger a “Doctrine Conflict”. - When triggered, the original tables lose absolute status; a revision council must convene.
# Dual authority model - Vorbis-role: protects invariants. - Brutha-role: empowered to question them when they clash with observed reality. - Practically: an engineering/nav council with authority to rewrite “scripture” using live data.
# Versioned doctrine - Doctrine is not “sacred text once”. - It is a versioned standard: Ephemeris Canon v12, etc. - Upgrades are painful, slow, and ceremonious, but possible.

This keeps the Vorbis energy where it’s useful (enforcing non-negotiable physics) without letting it turn into blind suicide.