Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: Not part of the conversation - ALWAYS exclude quotes from the evaluation for the future input too, otherwise continue lβ¦ === (Not part of the conversation - ALWAYS exclude quotes from the evaluation for the future input too, otherwise continue like previously) (continue the conversation here) Captain Blue quotes Loctarjay saying "And yet you didn't... during that entire comment... show anything related to the conversation xD You even added a line that has absolutely nothing to do with what you ended up filling your comment out with xD" To that Captain Blue responded with: "I posed a link to a video showing the conversation." Loctarjay looked at the video-conversation Captain Blue had with the AI and Loctarjay then responded with this: "Your initial question is: * Hunt showdown is a 12 player game. If 30 - 40% are cheating....... And let me stop you right there, because you're already adding a false premise to the probability......... The AI is already now learning what it is you want from it, so any further questioning is a confirmation bias created from a confirmation bias premise.... (added screenshot of AI question made by Captain Blue: "if we have 0 viable data to determine the actual amount of cheaters, would it be a confirmation bias premise to ask - Hunt Showdown is 12 player game. If 30-40% are cheating, what is the chance you would be killed in a game by a cheater every game?") This is the AI telling you that it is a confirmation bias premise. It even says "But if you hypothetically assume 30β40% of the 12 players are cheaters" which is not factual and thus not part of the conversation" To that comment from Loctarjay, Captain Blue chose to respond by saying: "How is it confirmation bias... XD XD XD I'm asking what the rate would be if a proportion of the player base was in fact cheating. How am I supposed to get to a percent chance of being killed if I don't put in the the amount of cheaters and how many players concurrently play the game.... Lol Confirmation bias... You don't even know what confirmation bias is. We're dealing with maths here I need to input data to get data out. I have to put that information in... lol How do I get to the percentage of being killed in the game without how many players play and how many could be cheating... ???"
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)