Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

==== Core Behavior (Original Content Only) ====
* Expands arguments by adding contextual/game-mechanic factors.
* Reframes criticism as misunderstanding of intent or scope.
* Uses AI-derived figures as supporting justification.
* Emphasizes complexity and situational variance.

Positive Indicators
* Acknowledges that multiple variables can affect outcomes.
* Attempts to move discussion beyond surface-level statistics.
* Shows willingness to revise framing (e.g., per-match vs per-death).

Negative Indicators
* Frequently asserts results without transparent derivation.
* Relies on hypothetical modifiers without falsifiability.
* Shifts goalposts between “cheater in lobby” vs “killed by cheater”.
* Treats AI outputs as confirmatory evidence, not models.

Behavioral Pattern Summary
* Explanatory but defensive.
* High confidence paired with low evidentiary transparency.
* Tends to argue from plausibility rather than verification.

Credibility Score: 45%
(Low–Moderate: contextual thinking present, but weak validation and moving frames)