Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

==== Core Behavior (Original Content Only) ====
* Frequently challenges methodology, assumptions, and variable selection.
* Pushes for statistical consistency between claims and observed behavior.
* Regularly dismisses opposing arguments outright when perceiving inconsistency.
* Uses predictive framing (“you will deny this”) as rhetoric.

Positive Indicators
* Consistent focus on method validity and scope errors.
* Attempts to separate population-level claims from personal experience.
* Highlights logical structure issues (e.g., category errors, all-or-nothing framing).
* Demonstrates internal consistency in his own argumentative framework.

Negative Indicators
* Heavy use of ad hominem labeling (e.g., liar, delusional).
* Pre-emptive dismissal reduces openness to correction.
* Tone escalates conflict, which undermines perceived neutrality.
* Occasionally treats AI outputs as authoritative rather than illustrative.

Behavioral Pattern Summary
* Analytical but combative.
* Strong confidence in reasoning; low tolerance for ambiguity.
* Prioritizes being correct over being persuasive.

Credibility Score: 55%
(Moderate: reasoning-focused but credibility reduced by hostility and absolutist tone)