Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6921ae73-3700-8000-8ab7-90012976bb8a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short answer: if every atom in the universe magically gained an extra electron, the universe would basically tear itsel… === Short answer: if every atom in the universe magically gained an extra electron, the universe would basically tear itself apart in an absurd, EM-powered disaster long before you could say “static shock.” Let’s break it down. ==== In real physics, electric charge is conserved. ==== * You can’t just create electrons out of nowhere. * If an atom gains an electron, it must come from somewhere else (another atom, pair creation with a positron, etc.). So your scenario already means: : But okay, let’s accept the “magic” and see what happens if it did anyway. ==== Right now, on large scales, the universe is almost electrically neutral: ==== * Atoms have equal protons (+) and electrons (–). * Gravity is the main long-range force structuring galaxies, stars, planets. If every atom gains 1 extra electron: * Every atom → negative ion. * The entire universe now has a huge net negative charge. * That means: - Like charges repel. - Electromagnetic repulsion starts fighting everything that holds matter together. This wouldn’t be “a little more lightning.” This would be electromagnetism vs. the whole universe. ==== Right now: ==== * Gravity is weak, but it wins on large scales because positive and negative charges mostly cancel out. * If charges don’t cancel, electromagnetism is ~10³⁶ times stronger than gravity between particles. So with all that extra negative charge: * Galaxies, stars, planets — held together by gravity — would be no match for the new enormous electrostatic repulsion. * Instead of slowly attracting and orbiting, matter would: - Try to fly apart. - Blast electrons off wherever it can to reduce the charge. You wouldn’t have a calm cosmos anymore; you’d have a universe-sized Coulomb explosion. ==== If each atom becomes a negative ion: ==== * Chemical bonds change drastically: - Electrons are what define bonding. - Extra electrons mean orbitals get filled wrong or become unstable. * Ordinary matter (like: - stars’ fusion processes - molecules - life chemistry …) would be seriously disrupted. What would start happening: # Electrons would escape Negative charges repel each other, so: - Atoms would try to shed the extra electrons. - You’d get gigantic currents and lightning-like discharges everywhere. # Matter becomes a chaotic plasma - Extra electrons flying around. - Ionized atoms chasing charge balance. - Universe filled with radiation and high-energy EM fields. Everything would try to get back to neutrality—but because you magically added electrons everywhere, there’s nowhere “neutral” to dump them. That’s why the whole universe itself becomes unstable. ==== On the biggest scales: ==== * Stars: - They rely on gravity pulling matter inward to balance pressure from fusion. - Extra charge → repulsion → stars can’t hold themselves together → many would blow apart or never form. * Galaxies & clusters: - Gravity wants to clump them. - Charge repulsion wants to spread them out. - EM wins → structures disperse, matter gets flung outward. * Planets & solid objects: - Held by gravity and chemical bonds. - Both are now sabotaged by excess electrons. - Earth-like objects would likely ionize and fragment. It’s like taking the universe and cranking the “electric chaos” slider to max. ==== Realistically, no: ==== * Physics would drive everything toward: - losing or annihilating those extra electrons, or - blowing matter apart until large-scale charge separation can form (like gigantic regions of different charge). But because your premise is “every atom gets an extra electron,” everywhere, all at once, the universe has no neutral refuge. The drive to neutralize is universal, but the imbalance is universal too. So you’d likely end up with: * A universe full of: - intense radiation - charged plasma - broken large-scale structures * Gravity would be a much smaller player compared to enormous EM fields. ===== If every atom in the universe gained an extra electron: ===== * You break charge conservation (so it’s already unphysical). * The whole universe becomes hugely negatively charged. * Electromagnetic repulsion overwhelms gravity. * Stars, galaxies, and planets become unstable and start tearing apart. * Atoms and chemistry get wrecked, turning the universe into a chaotic, overcharged plasma storm. If you want to push this further, we can also ask: * What if every proton lost its charge? * What if electrons stopped feeling electromagnetism entirely? Those are… even weirder.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)