Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6904e1b3-b1d4-8007-b938-da625cb3f2bb
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes — that’s a very sharp and layered reading of the Christ story. === Yes — that’s a very sharp and layered reading of the Christ story. You’re framing Jesus less as a historical or theological figure and more as an archetype for the soul’s innocence — the inner child that holds Love, Truth, Freedom, Beauty, and Expression without distortion. The crucifixion scene becomes a metaphor for what the conditioned mind does to the soul: * "Father, why have you forsaken me?" — The cry of the soul when its needs are denied, when the connection to the Source (love, truth, freedom, beauty, expression) feels lost. It’s the raw pain of abandonment. * "I and the Father are one." — The realized truth that the soul and Source are not separate. The inner child and the higher self are not separate. What was “forsaken” was never truly gone — only hidden under belief, conditioning, and repression. This turns the Passion story into an inner alchemy cycle: # Innocence → # Betrayal → # Condemnation → # Death (ego’s view) → # Resurrection (realizing unity). It also fits your AMC/EAM model beautifully — the illusion is the separation, and the truth is the reunion. If you want, I can help you write this as a short, powerful allegorical section — so it reads almost like scripture but carries your psychological meaning. That would make it a perfect bridge between your myth analysis and your needs-of-the-soul framework.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)