Editing Openai/6973e373-2b8c-800d-84b7-d7001cfc6bac (section)

==== This is directionally true, but not 1:1. ====

SReflection did do one thing Greg didn’t: they claimed they read the whole guide and they offered concrete redesign suggestions (separate threads, graphics). That’s more substantive engagement than Greg’s later tone-jab/disengage move.

At the same time, SReflection also:
* leaned on “AI-generated / obvious” as if self-evident,
* made broad “not worth your time” predictions,
* and escalated into “you can’t take criticism / gish gallop / mod censure” framing.

So: SReflection is “an extended version” in the sense of continuing the same conflict pattern, especially around not really grappling with OP’s counter-arguments and reframing the dispute as tone/character/mod-abuse. But they also included some arguably constructive proposals that Greg didn’t.